Experience Matters When it Comes to Tackling Tough Cases!
Contact Nacol Law Firm for help with Child Custody, Child Support, Child Visitation, Parental Alienation, Paternity, Interstate Jurisdiction, Property Division and Business Asset Protection.
Dallas Divorce Attorneys, Mark Nacol and Julian Nacol
Based in Dallas, Texas, the Nacol Law Firm PC, traces its roots to the firm of Mark A. Nacol and Associates PC, established in 1979. The Nacol Law Firm team shares its experience on a variety of legal topics here. See our recent posts below.
High Asset Divorces: Divorce Litigation
High Assets Divorces in Texas can be painstaking and involve substantial time and money to properly litigate an individual’s case.
- Original Petition and Temporary Orders
Single most important event for leverage is who files their Divorce Petition first. If you file first you are a Petitioner. A Petitioner receives a crucial benefit in litigation. A petitioner is afforded the opportunity to talk first and last in litigation, sets the tempo of the divorce, and creates the narrative of the litigation. Being a Petitioner is invaluable, thus if you have decided to file you should look to file first.
Temporary Orders are usually, absent emergency relief, the first hearing the Court will have in the case. At temporary orders the Judge will likely attempt to place a Band-Aid on all assets to insure there is not wasting of assets, custody and access of the children are determined, and payments remain the same of any separate or community property assets. Temporary spousal maintenance, exclusive use of property, and injunctions are granted at this hearing. With High Assets this hearing is pivotal in determining how litigation will continue in the future. Every Court is different but multiple additional temporary order may be filed or clarification motions.
2. Discovery Phase and Experts
The discovery phase may be cumbersome and painful. Discovery consists of multiple written questions. These include production questions (asking for documentation), interrogatories (questions require a written notarized response), admission (admit or deny questions), depositions (typically 6 hour cross examination in front of court reporter at an attorney’s office), and inventory and appraisal (sworn list of assets and values of each asset). These process are usually expensive but necessary to prove the amount of the marital estate and the characterization of property.
Experts are also employed at this stage. They are costly but necessary to prove tracing, value of fraud, or overall value of the business. These issue are likely contested, thus the battle of experts continue until the final hearing.
3. Depositions
A deposition is a formal question-and-answer session used in divorce cases to gather information under oath before trial. It typically takes place in a lawyer’s office, where one spouse (the deponent) answers questions from the opposing attorney while a court reporter records everything. The purpose of a deposition is to uncover facts, clarify disputes, and assess how a witness may testify in court. While it doesn’t happen in a courtroom, the statements made during a deposition carry legal weight and can be used as evidence later.
In high-asset divorces, depositions become even more critical because of the complex financial issues involved. Attorneys may ask detailed questions about business ownership, real estate holdings, investments, hidden assets, trusts, and even potential misuse of marital funds. If one spouse suspects the other of concealing wealth, forensic accountants or financial experts may analyze records and testify about discrepancies. The opposing attorney may also scrutinize spending habits, tax returns, and financial disclosures to ensure full transparency.
Because high-asset divorces often involve prenuptial agreements, inheritance disputes, or business valuations, preparation is crucial. A well-prepared spouse will work closely with their attorney to review financial documents and anticipate tough questions. While depositions can feel intense, remaining truthful, composed, and strategic can help protect one’s financial interests and ensure a fair resolution.
4. Mediation
Meditation may occur in the middle or toward the end of the litigation process. A good mediator may range from $2,000.00 to $3,500.00 per side. The mediation process can be difficult and last from a half to more than a full day. Some mediations go for 14 to 15 hours to obtain settlement. Though this is expensive it is still less costly than going to final trial and many outcomes may be obtain by agreement to which a Judge cannot order. The flexibility of mediation makes this process less painful and costly than attending final trial.
5. Final Trial before the Court or Jury
Final trial may be performed solely by a Judge or a Jury of 12 peers. Only 10 of 12 Jury members are needed to find in favor of either party. A Jury trial is more expensive, takes more time to prepare, and may be more risky depending on the County. A trial before the Judge is cheaper and may simplify many matters. It is important to know for every 1 hour in Court it takes more or less 4 hours to prepare.
A jury trial with a minimum of 2 experts and multiple other fact witness should take anywhere from 4 to 7 days. A trial before the Judge for a similar case may take 2-4 days, depending how the judge runs the Court.
There are many trials and tribulations an individual will have to surpass in the Court system if they are getting a divorce and the marriage contained with high assets. It will likely be costly, painful, but necessary. Many other factors such as summary judgements or motions to exclude experts, witnesses, or exhibits may increase fees. It is important to be confident with your attorney and find a firm that has experience with higher assets cases to ensure the flow and strategy of the litigation fulfills your goals.
High Asset Divorce Attorneys in Dallas Texas
Nacol Law Firm P.C.
(972) 690-3333
Going Through a Texas Divorce with a Special Needs Child
Going through a divorce can be a difficult time for all family members, including the children. The stress of dealing with a child that has a serious illness or difficulty prior to the initiation of a divorce may accelerate during the divorce process. We call such a child the “Special Needs Child”. This child has apparent or diagnosed emotional/medical problems.
Special Needs children are seriously impacted by the decisions made during a divorce. Many times the child becomes more vulnerable not knowing with is happening but very afraid of losing mom or dad forever and causing additional emotional and behavioral problems at home. It is important for parties to determine how meaningful regular visitation will be accomplished and which parent will have the right to make major decisions on how to address the child’s emotional and medical needs. During a divorce, most parents have difficulty agreeing on issues, especially issues related to the problems associated with a “special needs” child.
I. Child with Emotional Issues:
Children will always experience some level of negative emotions during the divorce process, even in the best circumstances. When a child has a mental illness or emotional problem, how visitation periods are managed, who has the authority to make a decision on medical treatment and therapy and how such decisions will be followed and enforced in each parent’s household will greatly affect the success or failure of the final decree as it pertains to the child. It is very important to have an order that is flexible and meets the child’s changing needs, yet remains enforceable should action need to be taken due to a parent’s failure to meet the needs or comply with the court’s order.
Three of the most reported emotional and behavioral issues involving children are Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Behavioral or Conduct Disorders, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), and chemical addictions.
2. Special Medical Needs
When a child has significant medical health problems or disabilities parents may have very different opinions on who should be the decision maker regarding doctors, medications and regimens for a particular situation. This may be compounded by the emotions and breakdown in the marital relationship often caused by the stress and differing opinions of the parents on the care of the child. The Court must help to balance the needs and rights of the parents so that each has a voice in their child’s treatment decisions. It is also important that the parties along with the Court work for a consistent treatment protocol to meet the child’s medical needs and best interests.
The real battleground in Texas custody cases becomes the allocation of rights and duties between the parties. This is exacerbated when the child involved has emotional or medical needs. Other factors that may compound issues are 1) other children involved and 2) whether they also have special needs. Major problems occur when there are differing views between the parents on how to best treat the problem or a lack of consensus among medical and mental health professionals as to the appropriate protocol for treatment and uncertainty among family courts as to which protocol
to “impose” upon the family.
Texas Courts vary greatly on how each allocates rights and duties, even in joint managing conservatorship situations. In the event the parties cannot agree on the allocation of rights pertaining to educational and medical decisions the courts must award custody based on the principle of what is the best interest of the child. The Court will consider many factors in developing a parenting plan including the development status of the child, the child’s temperament, and each child’s specific needs.
To make a meaningful decision on the care of the child, the court will need evidence of the following:
• Which parent is the most involved in the decision making as pertains to the relevant issue?
• What are the competing theories of how to best treat the child?
• Current opinions from the child’s physician and /or therapist.
• What is the generally accepted treatment for the specific condition?
• What is the likelihood of each parent following the protocol selected by the court?
• How successful has the treatment been in the past?
• What are the attitudes of the parents in relation to considering alternative methods if the current situation doesn’t work?
• Which parent has shown a proven effort at recognizing the child’s needs and working to address them?
The selection of a reputable expert in the particular field in which the child is affected is paramount to a true evaluation of the situation. Not all doctors and therapists are created equal and the expert must be a specialist in working with the child’s specific problem.
After the divorce is concluded, raising a special needs child requires a high degree of collaboration between both parents. This child feels very afraid and doesn’t have to be put in the middle of a parental alienation feud which could cause long term mental and physical scarring for both the child and the parents.
Parents, think about your child! Your child didn’t ask for a divorce but they will have to live with the consequences, good or bad, that your decisions leave them!
NACOL LAW FIRM P.C.
8144 Walnut Hill Lane
Suite 1190
Dallas, Texas 75231
972-690-3333
Office Hours
Monday – Thursday, 8am – 5pm
Friday, 8:30am – 5pm
OUR BLOGS
SEARCH
JOIN OUR NETWORK
Attorney Mark A. Nacol is board certified in Civil Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization